I blog weekly at wkc.org

I and Thou

April 24, 2009 1 comment

While I am at it — paying attention to my blog, I mean — I am adding this reflective piece on Martin Buber’s philosophical-theological-psychological classic, I and Thou.  But a big caveat should be noted here, because just like the book I reflect on, my own thoughts may not be easy to read.

Nevertheless, I add it to this site because it records one of the most important formative moments in my own understanding of the essence and practice of true Christian sprituality.  Maybe you will gain as much as I have from reading Buber.  Maybe not.  But at least you will know something of what has shaped my thinking.

I’ve been a bad blogger

April 24, 2009 Leave a comment

If you have followed this blog through its beginnings, I am sorry for the cessation of entries over this past while. The truth is that I have been writing a weekly entry for Westside King’s Church, and with that and the other teaching and writing that I am doing for my faith community, I seem to have nothing left for my own personal spot.

If you want to follow my thoughts, I recommend that you sign up for the email devotional at Westside King’s Church which I write weekly.

I intend to use this space to add notice of writings and sermons I would like to post on-line.

Categories: Uncategorized

Via Sacra prayer walk

January 8, 2009 1 comment

This past week we conducted our annual days of prayer here at Westside King’s Church.  This is the first part of a season and a series we call Via Sacra (sacred road).  As part of the days of prayer we constucted a prayer walk, a progressive and interactive approach to prayer which uses various prayer “stations” as places to pray.  We based this year’s prayer walk on the psalms, seeking to see the psalms as our school of prayer.  I am making available the guide I put together for the prayer walk, The Via Sacra 2009 Prayer Stations Guide.  I hope that this resource is of help to you in your desire to pray.

Categories: Biblical Spirituality

The Boy

December 16, 2008 Leave a comment

This is the time in the Christian calendar when we consider the meaning of the incarnation, or, God’s coming to us in the the person of Jesus.  Our current Christmas series intends to look at the meaning of Jesus’ life from the standpoint of his experience of our life, first as a baby, then as boy, and finally as a man.  While at Easter we consider why he died, it is this time in the season where we should consider the meaning of his life.  I was assigned the middle message in the series (the boy).  I began with the one story we have about Jesus’ boyhood and extended it into the 18 long years where he grows into full manhood.

These are what we call the silent years of Jesus, and this topic has fascinated me for some time now.  We call them his silent years because we have nothing written which can illumine that time period.  My interest is in what these years in Jesus’ life might mean to the development of not only his life, but every life.  For years of formation often come about in hiddenness.  You will see that in this message I took a “spiritual formation” track.  Jesus grew (Luke 2:52) is a statement about his humanity and an insight into our own formation before God.

So here is the text of the message I spoke this past weekend at Westside King’s Church.  It is entitled The Boy.

Thoughts about the Monastery

November 24, 2008 Leave a comment

Over the past few weeks, I have been asked for a way to articulate the ethos and background underlstanding of Suburban Monastery, one of my most important responsibilities at Westside King’s Church.  This is what I wrote for a denominational group looking to encourage more prayer within their churches: 

Suburban Monastery is a place, not a program. We say that we are not into the latest thing, but the oldest thing. We believe that the Christian church is rich in good tradition, in true experimentation, in worthy literature and exemplary saints, and that we ought to go back into the attic and rediscover what is ours.

We value and practice a bridge between evangelical and contemplative forms of Christian experience. We do this by taking time to consider the life that Scripture calls us to, understand how the church has reponded to this life in the past, and seek to experience this life right now through creative and engaged prayer. We believe that as we each learn to pray, we begin the path of transformation. Our prayer life is not purposefully one of intercession, but we have come to learn that as we pray the “our father” we inevitably pull others into our prayer.

We have come to understand that formation is related to form, and that a good and solid liturgy assists our experience of God. So we embrace anchor points – Scripture and tradition, respect for the whole church of Jesus, the push away from sectarianism and the embrace of the radical middle of the whole church. We carry deep respect for voices and ways much older than us.

Our name, Suburban Monastery, says two things. First, it speaks to our cultural context. We say that suburbia is not just a place – it is profoundly a state of mind. We fully admit our present condition as postmodern, technologically savvy, relationally broken, consumerist, entertainment driven, suburbanites. Our need is to find a different way of life, a slower and quieter life and more attentive life, one that is capable of the deeper change we need. And second, calling our place a monastery speaks to the alternate way of being we rehearse for 75 minutes on a Wednesday night. We call our place a monastery because the monastics saved culture by contrasting it. We want to be different (the old word here is holy), so that what is truly valuable in human life can be saved.

We do very simple things together. We come together in silence. We learn to listen to readings from Scripture and significant writings. We attempt a real engagement with Scripture so that we can discern the form of life we are called to. We share in conversation. And we respond to God with prayers and practices that open us to God as living presence. We do things that Christians have always done, the ways that Christians have learned to know God as living presence.

Our form of spirituality is a move away from spectacle and the spectacular (we are not loud or boisterous). It is a move towards noticing what is intrinsic to the common and everyday, in which of course, spectacular things happen on a regular basis – if we are able to see them.

Glimpse

November 3, 2008 Leave a comment

Here is the manuscripted version of a sermon I gave recently at Westside King’s Church.  It is part of a series called The Rumour, which attempts to give a telling of the gospel to contemporary Canadians from the book of Ephesians.  While the series does not attempt to be exactingly exegetical, the intention is to let our thoughts reflect the thoughts which come from this text.  This sermon is call Glimpse, and is based on the ideas which emerge in Ephesians 2.  I would love to hear your comments.

Categories: Sermons

Gethsemane Prayer of Jesus

October 21, 2008 1 comment

I have spent much of my ministry life thinking about and (with varying success) practicing the art of prayer.  Some years ago, I was drawn to the prayer of Jesus in the Gethsemane garden as a model prayer.  What especially struck me was Jesus’ boldness and frankness at this criticial moment.  It still remains utterly amazing to me that Jesus could ask God to release him from the way of the cross (even though he had long seen and taught that his vocation was to suffer and die, and afterwards to be raised up).  Gethsemane startles us when we take it seriously.  But it also opens up what is the true gift of the gospel: the confident and free expression of our selves before God in prayer and what this actually does to us and in us as we participate.

The exploration into the Gethsemane prayer was part of that process where I was learning that the point of prayer was its exploration of true relational confidence.  I came to see that prayer meant nothing if we did not express our truest self to God.  But there was more.  I saw further that what Jesus finally accomplished for us, his fully yielded will to God’s purposes, was realized precisely in this freest kind of prayer.

So prayer meant at least these two things: the freedom to express myself truly before God, and the way to overcome the short-sightedness of my human perspective and self-will.  This was the essence of what Jesus modelled in Gethsemane.

I am adding The Gethsemane Prayer of Jesus.  It is a substantial piece with varying subtleties of argument.  But I hope that you will see what I have come to see, that in Gethsamene, on the night of his arrest, Jesus modelled a prayer that was in sync with what he always taught: the prayer we call The Lord’s Prayer.

Categories: Biblical Spirituality

Spiritual Leadership

October 7, 2008 Leave a comment

The issues of leadership are in the air this fall.  Faced with national elections in the U.S. and Canada along with an economic meltdown we have not seen for generations (and of course there is always the ongoing moral meltdown), the question of who will lead us is a defining question for our time.  For many, the call for strong leadership is met with a lack of consensus as to what that leadership should look like.  Leadership, as always, is shaped by ideology and worldview.

I have added Spiritual Leadership as Representative, with the hope that it would point out some of the unique issues involved in discerning a leadership appropriate to the church’s need in this hour of history.  My proposal is that spiritual leadership is more of a representative and symbolic nature, and less functional than other kinds of leadership.  Of course, church leaders do have responsibilities, and this is naturally part of what they provide their communities.  But I contend that spiritual leadership is of such a nature that the ultimate value of a spiritual leader is found more in what they stand for than what they do.  What are your thoughts?

Categories: Ministry Life

A Voice Behind the Written Words

October 3, 2008 Leave a comment

I am adding a sermon I recently shared at Westside King’s Church.  It is entitled A Voice Behind the Written Words, and is part of the Unwritten series at the church.  The idea of the series is to talk about the gaps in our knowledge and experience, and is built on the idea that there are books that have not been written.  I took that idea and stretched it a bit to fit something I believe to be a defining deficiency in our time: the lack of appreciation for the living voice of God.  Perhaps because of the way some have overplayed this idea, making a mockery out of hearing and speaking for God, or because of the shyness we have about being too “mystical”, it seems to me that the sense of God as a living and speaking voice seems to have fallen out of favor.  I certainly do recognize the dangers and pitfalls of this issue, but I also affirm that God is a living voice, and that behind and in the written words there is a presence that speaks.  God is not limited by the errors and follies of our age.  There is a way to understand the enduring truth of God’s living voice and to bring mature and considered judgement to how we can listen better.

But first we need to affirm simply that he does speak.  And so I wrote this piece to “prime the pump”, as it were.  I can never escape Philip Yancey’s penetrating thought, that the thing God hates most is being ignored.

I value your feedback and comments.

Spiritual Co-inherence

September 26, 2008 Leave a comment

Since, then, you have been raised with Christ, set your hearts on things above, where Christ is seated at the right hand of God. Set your minds on things above, not on earthly things. (Colossians 3:1-2)

I am interested in the integration of two aspects of our inner life – mind and heart, or what we refer to as our intellect and our emotions. While I would assert that these are properties of the same self, it usually helps to make the distinction between what we hold as true in our rational mind from that which we moves us in our emotional mind. And while I would also make the case that these aspects are deeply connected, in the popular conceptualization, these properties of self are distinct. As a Christ-follower, then, I am interested in seeing these two aspects of my self become more integrated.

In philosophy-speak, we talk about the principle of co-inherence. This means that one thing can hold multiple properties at the same time. For instance, we might say that the property of “sweetness” inheres in a sugar cube, but this is not its only property. We can also say that the properties of “whiteness” and “squareness” also inhere. All of these properties thus “co-inhere” in the same sugar cube and are not mutually exclusive. I believe that it was Dallas Willard, the philosopher and student of the soul, who first pointed out the spiritual relevance of this philosophical descriptor.

The point is simple when it comes to authentic spirituality: there are multiple properties to it that must exist at the same time. We are one person, but we can never be described by one property. And to my point, mind and heart as intellect and emotion are both vital and deeply human properties that need a spiritual education. Even more specifically: theological soundness can be found alongside experiential vitality. True spiritual life is not a war between what we know rationally and what have come to experience. In the deepest sense, true spirituality is knowledge of the deepest kind, the kind that is truly felt, and deeply known. In the words of my friend Charles Nienkirchen, “what I know, I really know”.

And so my interest in the text above. In Paul’s letter to the Colossian Christians, he takes time to lay down what God has done for his people in and through Jesus. And then, as he often does, he makes a “since-then” argument. He says in effect: since God has done all this for us, we must put both our thoughts and our emotions in order, and do this in a unified and integrated way. It is this deep integration, this recognition of spiritual co-inherence, that is the sign of a truly maturing Christ-follower.

If you live only by how your Christian faith makes you feel (you would hardly be alone), but know little of it’s substance, you need to follow Paul’s advice: pursue depth of insight, pursue content. If, on the other hand, you know a lot of things about the Christian faith, but are hardly moved emotionally by what you know (and you would hardly be alone in this either), then you will need an education of the heart: seek to be a person who feels and is able to respond emotionally to these great things.

Of course, we need help in this and we cannot develop a mind and heart without God’s help in forming us. But whatever your starting point, pursue integration.

Categories: Biblical Spirituality